Shocking Proposal from Russian Parliament
In a move that underscores the moral decay of Russia's political elite, State Duma Deputy Andrey Gurulyov has suggested a tax on citizens who choose not to have children, ostensibly to ensure their financial support in old age. Gurulyov's statement reveals a startlingly callous approach to aging and social responsibility, questioning who will care for the childless in their twilight years. His perspective is disconcerting, as it shifts the burden of societal welfare onto individuals rather than the state, which has historically been viewed as responsible for its citizens.
Childless Citizens Under Fire
Gurulyov, a member of the ruling United Russia party, recently discussed this proposal with former governor of the Zabaykalsky Krai, Ravil Geniatulin. He bluntly stated, "Who should support a person without offspring in their old age? The state, of course, when you become infirm. Because you are needed by no one; you left no legacy behind." These chilling words reflect a profound misunderstanding of human dignity and the role of government in providing care for its aging population.
Putin & Medvedev
State’s Erosion of Responsibility
According to research on population aging in Russia, the nation has faced significant demographic shifts since the early 1990s, with a declining population size and increasing numbers of elderly citizens. The state is expected to provide adequate support and services to this vulnerable demographic. However, Gurulyov’s proposal indicates a dangerous pivot away from this responsibility, suggesting that citizens who do not contribute to the birthrate deserve less state support.
Implications for Society
This taxation scheme could have dire implications for social cohesion in Russia. It could lead to further marginalization of those who are childless, whether by choice or circumstance. The message is clear: if you are not contributing to the population growth, you are less deserving of the state’s care. This is an affront to the values of compassion and community support that should underpin any society.
Russia's Duma passes bill tightening control over income of ...
Historical Context of Elder Care in Russia
Historically, the Russian state has maintained a paternalistic approach to elder care, with the expectation that the government will support its aging population, as reported by research on state support for elderly citizens. However, the shift towards individual responsibility, as suggested by Gurulyov, reflects a broader trend of neoliberal policies that prioritize economic efficiency over social welfare. This is particularly alarming as the elderly have already been one of the most vulnerable and disrespected groups in the population, as highlighted in studies on the effects of economic changes in the 1990s.
The Moral Crisis in Russian Politics
Gurulyov’s comments expose a moral crisis within Russian politics. The notion that a tax on childless citizens is a viable solution to funding elder care is not just impractical; it is deeply unethical. It not only stigmatizes those without children but also places the burden of care on individuals rather than on a state that has the resources and obligation to support its citizens. Such a proposal reveals a profound failure in leadership and a lack of compassion for the most vulnerable members of society.
This trend must be challenged. Instead of placing financial penalties on those who do not conform to outdated societal norms of family and reproduction, the government should focus on improving the overall welfare system for all citizens, especially the elderly. The shame and disgrace of Gurulyov's proposal must be exposed and resisted, highlighting the urgent need for a more humane and just approach to aging and social responsibility in Russia.
Official Website of the Government of the Russian Federation
